If It Really Was My Life Story, Why Does It Change Each Time I Tell It?

. RSS

There is no story I know better than my own.

And yet, almost every time I tell it, something changes.

Not the major events. Not the people or places. The facts remain mostly the same. What changes is the meaning I attach to them. Connections that once seemed important begin to fade. Small moments I barely noticed at the time suddenly feel central. Coincidences become patterns. Losses become turning points. Conversations I once dismissed quietly reshape the entire narrative.

Over time, I’ve realized something unsettling and strangely comforting:

We do not simply remember our lives.
We reinterpret them.

And in doing so, we slowly reinterpret ourselves.

Author Pat Conroy once wrote:
“The most powerful words in the English language are: Tell me a story.”

But stories are never completely fixed. They continue evolving because we continue evolving.

For more than 35 years, I participated in a monthly men’s group through my church. Each month, one person would spend about 45 minutes telling the story of his life. The purpose was simple: to know each other more honestly. We believed men often stayed guarded, even among friends, and that listening deeply to another person’s story created trust, understanding, and connection.

Over the years, people moved away, new people joined, and eventually some of us began repeating our stories.

That’s when something fascinating happened.

The same events often carried different meanings the second or third time they were told.

A painful moment that once sounded unresolved later carried acceptance. A disappointment became a lesson. A coincidence became a defining turning point. Sometimes the facts barely changed at all, but the interpretation changed completely.

I noticed this in others, and eventually I noticed it in myself.

The retelling itself seemed to create new understanding.

It was as though people were discovering the meaning of their lives while speaking out loud.

I began to wonder whether this is true for all of us.

Perhaps we are not only shaped by what happens to us, but by the meaning we continue assigning to those events over time.

People come and go in our lives, often without us fully understanding their impact until much later. Some relationships seem temporary until we look back and realize they quietly changed our direction. Other moments feel insignificant at the time but later become impossible to separate from who we became.

As we change, our stories change with us.

And maybe that is not inconsistency at all.

Maybe it is growth.

This idea—that identity is shaped quietly through interpretation, relationships, memory, and reflection—eventually became one of the central themes in my book What Matters: We Are the Sum of Small Moments.

Because sometimes the meaning of our lives is not found in dramatic events, but in the gradual understanding of moments we once overlooked.

Are We the Sum of All Small Moments?

. RSS

I’ve been thinking about this idea again, that we are the sum of small moments.

Partly because it’s central to What Matters. Partly because I recently sent the updated ebook to friends. And partly because certain ideas don’t stay settled once you live with them long enough.

If we are shaped by small moments, does that mean all of them?

Not just the meaningful ones. Not just the moments of clarity or connection. But the moments of pain. Confusion. Loss. The long stretches where nothing seems to move at all.

It’s tempting to say yes, to treat every moment as equally formative. But I’m no longer sure that’s true.

Some small moments leave a mark because they ask something of us. Others don’t. They arrive, exist briefly, and fade without instruction or lesson. And that doesn’t make them useless.

Painful moments, for example, don’t shape us simply by existing. They shape us because we respond to them, by resisting, enduring, interpreting, or eventually reframing them. Pain reminds us that we are still here. Still engaged. Still part of the world, even when the experience is difficult.

And if I’m honest, I still prefer that option.

When I consider the alternative, numbness, absence, or not being here at all, it clarifies something important. Meaning only becomes visible because contrast exists. The good in life doesn’t float freely; it takes shape because it stands beside struggle, effort, and uncertainty. Over time, we even begin to rank what matters—not everything, but some things.

Friendships are a good example.

As time moves on, some friends grow distant. Some disappear entirely. They’re not always replaced by new people in the same way. Sometimes they’re replaced by memory—by an earlier version of life when they were essential.

That doesn’t mean those relationships failed. It means their work was completed.

What remains isn’t constant presence, but significance.

Then there are the empty moments—the ones that don’t seem to carry meaning at all. No insight. No lesson. No emotional weight. Just space.

For a long time, I thought those moments were gaps to be filled. Now I think they might be doing quiet work of their own. They offer release. Recovery. A pause between chapters. Without them, the rest of life would press too hard, too continuously, to be sustained.

So maybe we aren’t the sum of all small moments in the same way.

Maybe we are shaped by:

• the moments that demand response,

• the moments that clarify contrast, and

• the moments that give us room to rest before the next meaning appears.

Not everything stays with us. Not everything needs to. But what does remain—what continues to echo, quietly becomes part of who we are.

This tension, between what shapes us and what quietly passes, is one of the central threads running through What Matters, a collection of reflections on presence, change, and meaning over time.

And that, I think, is closer to what What Matters has been trying to say all along.