Thoughts on a The Writing Life or Ramblings that Suggest Thoughts
I read the book, The Writing Life, by Annie Dillard for the first time in 2001 and again in 2015. I just finished it again. (I mark the date inside the cover when I read a book because I often re read them)
This book is like a lot of books written by accomplished and skilled writers. The comments of the critics written on the back cover of the book reveal a common thread to these type of books. "A kind of spiritual....". "For non-writers, it is a glimpse into the trails and satisfactions.....". "Anyone hoping to see inside the process of literary artistry....", are some comments from "The Critics Praise".
Looking at how many of these books flow, it seems to me that they both pontificate and at the same time evangelize the life and thought processes of the writer.
The New York Times said "Annie Dillard is a wonderful writer and "The Writing Life" is full of joys." She is a great writer but the book doesn't push her joys as much as it suggests the struggle of writing.
It talks of laying out words. Words written and discarded and the long time it takes. Writing in an isolated place sometimes a cabin or special room. When it mentions things like cabins, rooms or typewriters it goes into great detail. Daily routine is always included and is explored in great detail. The routine seem to suggest that a process is like marks on a trail that have to be found to get to the destination,
After detailing out the processes and everything that has popped into their mind, these "Writing Life" authors seem to get to the same point. The plot and story just happens. The characters sort of tell the author what to write. Well learn that well defined characters can have thoughts of their own. Sometimes the words just pops into the writers mind. Creativity just happens when perhaps you are living the life?
Steven King's book, "On Writing" is similar in some ways. He has his routine and tool chapters, but the writing itself seems to demonstrate what great writing can be.
PS: New Post in What Matters Section...............The Picture section consists of pictures I took or like and have made me think.
A Liberal Society vs's Totalitarian Society
A war of ideas. Discusses two different universes of reference, two civilizations and two cultures.
The Western impulse is to rebel, and can be traced back to an impulse to rebel against God. The struggle testifies to the sincerity of ones beliefs. It may also strengthen the beliefs.
In the Muslim tradition there is no impulse to rebel. They have no struggle or temptation to rebel. Submission is everything. Another way to look at it might be considered a life with agency vs's no agency. The irony of the position is that it asks total obedience to secret leaders whose principles are to break every principle.
This book was written by Paual Berman in 2004 but has even more relevance today.
See pictures section May 30th for information on what snails eat. Has nothing to do with anything
Ellis Kackley, Best Damn Doctor in the West /The Best Story is You!
Dr. Kackley lived in Soda Springs Idaho and helped those in the small towns in that part of Southeastern Idaho. He was a doctor for Butch Cassidy on a few occasions. These small towns were wild and growing fast in the late 1800's and early 1900's. The small towns often had two sides. One wild with gambling and all that went with it and the other hard working ranchers and farmers.
This book presented a good story and was well down but it was particularly interesting to me because our families pioneered the settlements throughout the areas mentioned in the book and a real life like experience is felt from the book For example, we don't know if Great Great Grandma **Ruth worked directly with Dr. Kackley, but the towns and the dates match perfectly.
Dr. Ellis Kackley was instrumental in the construction of the Caribou County Hospital in Soda Springs Idaho. With a $30,000 bond and his $3,000 donation the 30 bed hospital opened it's doors on December 1, 1925. He and his son, Dr. Evan Kackley donated much of the medical equipment. The hospital served the county until 1969 when the new Caribou Memorial Hospital opened.
**Ruth grew up and was the mother of ten children. She worked helping those in need and also went as doctor and nurse to every home where sickness prevailed.
Stephen King On Writing / A short course and a clear example!
Stephen King is the master craftsman of writing. He tells us a lot about himself in his book, "Stephen King On Writing, A Memoir of the Craft".
Early in the book he says:
"You must not come lightly to the blank page".
The irony of this quote is that this book was completed after his his very serious accident. He was hit head on while walking along along the gravel shoulder of Maine State Road Route 5. It was his habit to walk along this same road in the country near his house. It was June 19, 1999 at about 4:30 PM when a van coming towards him hit him. H e flipped and flew through the air landing 14 feet from the road.
When this terrible accident happened this book was about half way through the first draft. He offers a lot of detail on the event and his recovery. You really see that he did not indeed re-approach his writing lightly.
The book covered events from his life growing up, school experiences, his marriage, early efforts at writing and his first big success, the book Carrie.
He discusses the craft of writing and offers examples that are a real help. The whole book, life history and all, were examples of writing style and you learn just from reading it. Another statement of his I like is:
If you want to be a writer you have to do two things above all others: read a lot and write a lot.
The idea of why you have to read a lot really didn't sink in for me until I read this book. The reality that you have to read before you learn to write is something that takes time to sink in. This book helped.
The value of reading also changed for me because of Stephen King. I have gotten over feeling I had to be reading only classic literature and have come to value good stories. I enjoy his books but some do scare me. You will have to see which ones scare you but two I could mention for me were "Christine" and "Revival".
Falstaff Give Me Life, by Harold Bloom / Falstaff is a happy fellow it seem! →
I have made some comments below about Professor Bloom and his favorite Shakespearean character, Falstaff.
Harold Bloom is a Shakespeare Scholar and Sterling Professor of Humanities at Yale. He was a former Harvard Professor. He knows the Shakespeare plays like no one alive today.
He has said of Shakespeare that these particular plays are his favorites: Henry IV and parts 1 and 2 of Henry V. Bloom makes this choice because of his appreciation and love of the character Falstaff who has interesting roles in these plays. Bloom thinks of himself as a Falstaff character.
Falstaff is a happy guy (Tragic and Comic). He mocks faith, can be lewd, funny and reckless. When thinking of him Bloom offers these comments for traits: 'age, care, wisdom, & reflection!"
He imagines Falstaff and Socrates meeting in a pub and trading wit. This would be the ideal play script and it has been a wish of his for many years. The idea of one character from one play and then another from another and then someone way back in history meeting and talking would take a deep understanding of what the characteristics and personalities of those involved would be. For Bloom this is no problem and he seems to know the characters extremely well
I hope at 86 I can care enough about some of my reading to imagine my own plots. What focus to have carried the image of character you read about for years. It testifies of both the strength of the author and of the student.
Quotes about Falstaff
“Hal, if I tell thee a lie, spit in my face, call me horse.”
― William Shakespeare, King Henry IV, Part 1
“I’ll be no longer guilty of this sin; this sanguine coward, this bed-presser, this horseback-breaker, this huge hill of flesh,—”
― William Shakespeare, King Henry IV, Part 1
“How now, my sweet creature of bombast! How long is't ago, Jack, since thou saw'st thien own knee?”
― William Shakespeare, King Henry IV, Part 1
The Stranger In The Woods, by Michael Finkel & Walden By Henry David Thoreau
The Stranger in the Woods: The Extraordinary Story of the Last True Hermit
By Michael Finkel
People spend their lives in cities or in the country virtually all have a roof over their head. Christopher Knight chose something different. At age 20 he left his home in Massachusetts and drove to Maine. He went into the forest and did not have any human contact for almost 30 years. He had taught himself some survival techniques but mostly learned through the processes he lived through. He lived mainly in a tent where of course the winters were very cold and harsh.
He had no food and lived off the land. Sometimes he broke into area houses for food, clothing, reading material and whatever he could find. He said he only took what he needed but it was a frighting experience for the communities and it finally lead to his capture.
He was interviewed and the material for this book came from those notes. His life is detailed in this book as are some of the reasons he chose to leave. Problems in returning were also discussed.
Henry David Thoreau's book, Walden; Or Life in the Woods
Thoreau's experience in the woods was very different than Christopher Knights. As you read in his book "Walden" you find the experiences almost surreal. They were harsh but nature seemed to accommodate him. The experience and his efffort was what seemed to be a form of religion. He likely learned a lot as he went through the experience but before ever going into the woods he was a naturalist, essayist, and early environmentalist.
He said of this time in his life to the world that he:
wished to "live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and … learn what it had to teach."
He actually wound up building a cabin on the shores of Walden Pond — on land owned by Ralph Waldo Emerson — outside Concord, Massachusetts. He said of that time that he observed nature, farmed, built fences, surveyed, and wrote in his journal.
These two books both spoke of confronting nature but they couldn't be more different.
The Unlikely Pilgrimage of Harold Fry / comparing to Ulysses
Harold Fry is a retired sales rep, and a worn down husband. Up to the time he retires he was a "passive observer of his own life", but that changes as we walk with him and ponder over his life.
His passive response to his past has a lot to do with his wife, his son, and events at work over a long career. He receives a letter and learns that his friend from work twenty years ago, Queenie Hennessy, has cancer. It has been years since he had any contact, but he decides to go see her. It requires him to walk 627 miles and takes 87 days. (Not sure why he felt he had to walk but the book wouldn't be the book if he had just jumped in the car)
The journey and the experiences frees him from his past but it also seems to offer some freedom to the reader. His wife worries a lot but then she winds up being freed from her past. We experience the walk ourselves and as a lifetime of problems seem to slip away for Harold maybe some of our own problems start to seem a little different?
Three questions occur to me about Harold's Pilgrimage. Does making this trip make sense?
Could things really change because of the trip? Do the things that happened make sense?
A question of interest would be to learn "Why" Rachel Joyce wrote this book about Harold Fry? What did she want to do? Did she want the reader to leave wondering about Queenie Hennessy, his work friend who wrote him the letter, enough to then buy her next book? ( I haven't done that) She could have just wanted to write about why dull lives are not really dull if you think a lot about them. So go ahead and read the book and think about that
The book is well worth reading even if your not sure why it was written?
Use Buy Button Below to purchase this book from Amazon
Why I Write, by George Orwell →
George Orwell, may have changed the world with his book "1984", but what is it that brought him to the point where his writing reflected such deep political insight? Has his books changed the world?
The book, "Why I Write,” answers these questions and is useful in understanding the author’s works. Orwell gave four reasons for writing. When he talked about the reason writing for a Political Purpose. He said that no one is free from political bias, and he defined politics as:
"Desire to push the world in a certain direction, to alter other people's idea of the kind of society that they should strive after".........
An example of the political bias of his book, 1984, is clear right now with a group of independent movie theaters across the country showing the movie"1984" as a Presidential protest. Orwell's thoughts about governments out of control resonate just as much today as in 1946 when the book was published.
Orwell was born in India, and he served with their Imperial Police and also in the Republican Army in the Spanish Civil War. Knowing that and also his thoughts about why to write add a lot to his book’s messages and conclusions.
Orwell gave four good reasons in his book: "Why I Write.”
1. Sheer egoism. This is probably obvious, but he also suggested that writers share this with scientists, artists, politicians, lawyers, and others.
2. Aesthetic enthusiasm. This has to do with the beauty of the world.
3. Historical impulse. This is the need to let folks know the facts.
4. Political purpose. This, in part, is "the desire to push the world in a certain direction, to alter people's idea of the kind of society that they should strive after.”
Another Important thought from the book is expressed in this quote:
The difficulty of literature is not writing but writing what you mean."
-Robert Louis Stevenson, 1850 - 1894.
Writing Down the Bones: Freeing the Writer by Natalie Goldberg
Writing Down the Bones: Freeing the Writer by Natalie Goldberg
I liked Natalie Goldberg from the first time I read her books. She had me on board when I realized that New Mexico was special to her. I love New Mexico and figure that it is indeed a "Land of Enchantment" but it takes a special person to see that, and they are usually artists.
Natalie brings Zen and Spirituality into her approach to finding creativity. She explores their sources in some unique ways. She looks closely at the processes of daily writing, where you write and even what you use to write.
She sees inspiration as coming from the effort. Not just the result but effort itself. The book covers the basics of writing and does it well.
Goldberg encourages readers to trust that their own individual lives can be a story and see themselves as a resources of writing. The more people write about themselves the more they question themselves and can understand themselves.
Finding creativity within and releasing it, is different than seeking it from from outside influences.
This book could be an introductory approach to writing. It discusses some classes she taught for beginners. Looking inside ourselves to find creativity may not resonate with the beginning writer but it will be a real plus for the seasoned writer who goes to this book to get recharged. Natalie is a true professional.
The Joy of Painting with Bob Ross/ and comments on Bob
The Joy of Painting with Bob Ross
Painter of the Happy Little Tree
This post on Bob Ross may be a little surprise. Many will not remember him. His show on television (1983 - 1994) was a delight to watch. He would talk with his soft voice while he painted. He would talk about what he was painting and the approach he was using. He really had a talent and when he painted a tree it was like magic. It just came into existence right in front of your eyes.
Often he would take his brush to a place and begin to paint and would say that he was painting a "Happy Little Tree". Loved it when he did that. I have thought of that phrase so many times over the years. O yes, "A Happy Little Tree". Bob Ross had a passion for what he loved.
I was surprised looking at Amazon, where his book is listed and can be bought, that you can go to a merchandise list for Bob Ross items. You can, for example, buy Bob Ross Socks. Wow! That is interesting.
Passion for what you love is the message that Bob still conveys.
bird by bird by Anne Lamott
Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life by Anne Lamott
Books about writing. especially those that are done by someone who is very skilled at the process, give you a boost and renew you.
Carolyn See, Natalie Goldberg, Mary Karr, Anne Lamott, Anne Dillard and a few others are all very talented, and it is just a pleasure to read what they write about writing.
Anne Lamott's seems to have been born a writer. I mean most of these talented people loved writing and books from an early age, but she really seems to have been a actual writer at an early age.
Her father was a writer and her accounts of her early life and his influence are a unique side of her. In this book she transitions into her chapters on writing technique from her own life story and the advice her father gave her brother. The book took it's name from that advice where he counseled him to tackle his story on birds, one bird at a time.
Her advice on writing is pretty basic, but it just feels different. It is her ability to offer simple advice in such a easy to read, free flowing style, that is so effective. You find yourself relaxing and just enjoying her language and her perspective on the process.
Some authors seem to put an unusual word or phrase into the dialog to "wake you up", but with Anne she evolves quite naturally from instruction to the language of life itself.
It is a good book and it can help you go back and "sharpen the saw" as Steven Covey would say.